R. L. Allan's ESV3 in Buffalo Grain Goatskin (Black and Antique Brown)

Turns out what I expected to write about the new Allan's ESV3 and what I'm actually writing are two different things. Here's what I expected: "If you like the top-of-the-line Allan's ESV in highland goatskin, but this economy has put it too far out of reach, then there's a runner up edition that might do for you. But my advice is to scrimp and save until you can make up the difference, then go with the Real Thing." Not that I figured the ESV3 would be a disappointment. I just didn't think it would hold its own in a side-by-side comparison with the ESV1. 

Only I was wrong.

I'm not going to say the ESV3 is better, because there are definitely some disadvantages to choosing the less expensive edition. But it's certainly a contender -- and for more reasons than just the price tag. So let's take a closer look.

Above: The ESV3 is available in Antique Brown Goatskin (above) and Black Goatskin.

The ESV3 shares one thing with the ESV1: the text block. Internally, the two editions are the same. Everything I wrote about the ESV1 text block is true of the ESV3, so I won't repeat myself here. What's different is what happens around the margins. For one thing, the ESV3 comes with standard gilt edges, the shiny gold treatment, instead of the red-under-gold art gilt option. Instead of three ribbons, there are just two -- but they're the same thick, high-quality markers you get with the ESV1. The cover is goatskin, but not the natural grained, leather-lined highland stuff. Instead, these skins are stamped with an attractive buffalo grain. They're stiffer, too. Flexible, but not limp. The semi-yapp edges from the ESV1 are gone as well, replaced by a more conventional not-quite-flush edge.

In other words, the ESV3 is what an Allan's ESV1 would look like if it came with a Cambridge binding from the 70s, only a little nicer. Not too shabby, if you ask me.

Above: The pages are gilt, the cover loses the semi-yapp edge, and there are just two ribbons. Still, it's quite nice.

The ESV3 is reserved yet refined, the workmanlike aesthetics upgraded by a seriously attractive goatskin cover. Remember the Brevier Clarendon in buffalo grain calfskin? This is a similar idea, only it's much more flexible. Presumably the flex is due to the grain being stamped into goatskin instead of calfskin, but I can't say for sure. The closest comparison in terms of feel would be the goatskin covers on Cambridge's current Pitt Minions, except that this is slightly more pliable.

Beauty may be in the eye of the beholder, but I think most of us would agree that these covers qualify:

Above: Antique Brown (left) and Black.

Not everyone wants a limp cover. Not everyone likes art-gilt edges or semi-yapp overhangs. If you can identify, then you'll prefer the ESV3 over its more expensive counterpart. And you won't be missing out in terms of quality, because the ESV3 is a clean, well-executed edition. It might even have an edge when it comes to opening flat. Strange as it sounds, I could see people choosing the ESV3 not because of the lower price but because its rugged, austere beauty appeals more than the ESV1's opulence.

Since the ESV1 is available in black and brown, it's only natural to make some side-by-side comparisons. My black ESV1 comes with one of the grainier covers, so I found myself preferring it instinctively to the ESV3 with its more regular stamped grain.  

Above: The ESV3 (top) vs. the ESV1

When it came to the brown, though, I was torn. The Antique Brown color really shows off the drama of the grain, so while its styling details are more austere, there's something rather smart-looking about the overall effect. As nice as the chocolate brown goatskin it, I found myself thinking I could live with the Antique Brown and never feel like I was missing out.

Above: The chocolate brown ESV1 (left) vs. the antique brown ESV3. Which would you choose?

Above: Detail showing the different styling choices.

Above: Same layout, different details. Semi-yapp, gilt line, art-gilt pages on left. No overlap, no line, simple gilt on the right.

Of course, I'm a sucker for semi- and full-yapp edges, and find three ribbons essential for my usual reading plan. It's hard to trade the art-gilt pages for simple gilt, too, give the way it scratches so easily. Even so, you can understand why, comparing the two, it's hard to think of the ESV3 as a downgrade. It's different, yes. Lacking the leather lining, it's arguably not as high up on the quality ladder. But compared to most choices out there, this one is hard to fault.

Above: The refined natural grain of the highland goatskin (top) compared to the uniformly rugged antique brown.

Above: The ESV3 in antique brown and black (top) stacked with the brown and black ESV1.

As I mentioned, the ESV3 might have an edge when it comes to opening flat. I find it opens easily and remains open on the table. I have no idea why. While the ESV1 opens flat as well, there's an intangible difference -- I can't put my finger on it -- that makes me want to give the edge to the ESV3. Maybe the stiffer cover is a factor, I really don't know. One thing is certain. There's no compromise involved in the ESV3 binding. It's excellent.

But there's something to be said for a limp cover, and here the ESV1 reigns supreme. Both Bibles take to yoga positions, as seen below, but the ESV1 hunkers low, born down by the weight of the text block, showing no subsequent signs of stress. The ESV3 is perfectly flexible, but stiff enough to arch a bit more, and once it recovers, it needs a little massage to look pristine again.

Above: The ESV3 (left) can go, but not as low as the ESV1.

* * *

ORDERING INFORMATION

The ESV3 can be ordered from EvangelicalBible.com, the US distributor of Allan's Bibles, for $120, which is $25 less than the cost of the ESV1. Follow these links for ordering information and more details, including lots of additional photos:

ESV3, Antique Brown Buffalo Grain Goatksin

ESV3, Black Buffalo Grain Goatskin

As always, you can check the R. L. Allan's ESV Page for a list of available editions and pricing, too.

Comments

[David Dewey]

When I enquired about the ESV3, Allan's also told me that it lacks the maps found in the ESV1. And I really like to have maps in a Bible. However, from your photos I think the antique brown colour is preferable to both the tan and darker brown ESV1s. But as I have one of the original tan Allan's ESV, I'm still trying to wonder if I can justify either the new dark brown ESV 1 or the antique brown ESV3. Unfortunately, the pound/dollar exchange is going against us in the UK.

[David]

Order directly from R. L. Allan in Glasgow then: http://www.bibles-direct.com/

[Glen]

Awaiting the arrival of my ESV3 to compare it to my ESV1. If it's anything like you say in your review, the ESV3 will be my carry-everywhere version. Anyway, I'm sure it will outshine anything Cambridge presently has to offer.

[RP]

How does the ESV3 compare to the ESV2 in terms of the leather cover? I have an ESV2 with the grained goatskin and found it to be quite stiff at first (although I will say it has broken-in well after just 4 months of use). Not having maps in the ESV3 would be a negative for me as my ESV2 doesn't have maps either and I found myself consulting a study aid frequently when reading throught the Pentateuch and the conquest of Canaan.

[Blair Paterson]

I know this question does not relate to the specific bible in question, but more of the translation: ESV. I am quite comfortable with the NRSV - could you assist me and explain what the difference is between the two translations. Is it only philosophical/theological differences, or are the actual translations different. If I am to spend my money on a good bible, I want to know as much as I can from someone who knows a bit about it.

[Nick Potratz]

Hello Mark (or anyone else who knows), I am wondering about the lining on this edition: is it the usual cheapo plastic-coated paper, or something else perhaps? Is there a board under the leather? If so, how thick?

If you could add a pic or two of the linings that would be great. Heck, lining is half the battle. Thanks!

[Chris]

Mark, do you know anything about what evangelicalbible.com mentioned in their blog a few months back regarding an upcoming "classic reference ESV" from Allans? Coped below...

"We probably should have been more discreet here. For certain contractual reasons I can not elaborate in detail.
What we can say is that we will have a completely NEW TYPEFACE that will be the best Classic Reference Bible available. It will be a monumental publication since we will have both the best binding as well as the best type face! Of course we will keep you posted!"

[David Dewey]

Mark, you say in your review of the ESV3 that "the semi-yapp edges from the ESV1 are gone as well, replaced by a more conventional not-quite-flush edge". This certainly seems the case, both from your pwn pictures and those on Allan's website. However, Allan's describe the ESV3 as having semi-yapp pages. I wonder whether there is an agreed definition of a semi-yapp edge. Any thoughts?

[David Dewey]

One comment asks about the differences between the NRSV and ESV. Going to the relevant websites and reading the translators' introductions is probably the best way to find out. The quick answer, however, is that both are revisions of the Revised Standard Version. The ESV is the more conservative revision, changing less of the text and avoiding gender inclusive language. The NRSV alters more of the RSV text and uses gender inclusive language extensively (though never in relation to God). Editions of the ESV also include cross-references and a concordance; most editions of the NRSV do not. The NRSV often comes with the Apocrypha; only Oxford has an ESV with the Apocrypha. The NRSV is more widely accepted ecumenically and is recommended by many theological colleges; the ESV is perceived mainly as a conservative evangelical translation. Such perceptions, however, are very hard to justify on the basis of translation philosophy: they have more to do with marketing and with who gets signed up to recommend which version. You really have to make your own mind up.

[Paul]

The ESV is considered an evangelical translation for good reason. It is true that the NRSV and ESV are revisions of the RSV-however I would say substantially different revisions. Gender inclusivity is only one factor. Old Testament prophecies were rendered obscure through NRSV translation (eg. Isaiah 7:14). References to homosexual sin are also obscured in the NRSV translation. (1 Cor. 6:9)
In regards to market share the ESV is now ranked 4th. The Spanish Reina Valera is ranked 10th and the NRSV is not in the top 10-(2007-CBA statistics) The NRSV is used by a small portion of liberal and 'mainline' churches in the US.

The NRSV translators are taken from ranks of liberal Christendom. The ESV translators from conservative Christendom.

The differences are not trivial in my opinion.

[Alan]

I like the antique brown over the chocolate, although I prefer the tan (which I have) to both. Would you consider the Buffalo Grain leather more durable? I wonder if they might actually do one bound in genuine buffalo. If I were going with a black Bible, I think the natural grain looks better. Black and rugged don't seem to blend very well.

Picture request: Comparison shot of the brown buffalo grain and the brown ESV Pitt Minion.

[Ben Ting]

I just received my ESV3 Antique Brown. Comparing the brand new Bible with my "yr-old-used" ESV1, there is no comparison in "open flat" category. The well-used-ESV1 wins outright...(only logical.)

And without the semi-yapp, the gilt edge does look dangerously "exposed" to the elements. My advice is, if u gonna buy just 1 ESV only, go for ESV1. As for the end papers, they look similar to those used in my Cambridge Pitt Minion - simple (not cheap), nice & elegant.

Lastly, I wonder when will Allan put back the lined papers as per the "original" ESV1...

Btw, I notice the text block now has the "double stitch" thingy treatment not just on the front, but the back too!

[Knight]

Great review.

Has anyone looked at Crossway's Calfskin Classic Reference Bibles?

I have been considering saving up for a high quality ESV and I'd like to see a review as detailed as these for that product so I can compare with Allan's offerings.

Thanks.

[Steve Robenalt]

Knight - I received a Crossway Calfskin when they first came out and can say that the leather cover is great! It's very soft and smooth, but it also shows scratches very easy. What I didn't like was the binding. No better than any of their others in my opinion. It would lay open flat in Gen. or Rev. for example and just felt stiff. I was disappointed.

I now have an Allan's and can say the binding is great, just what I hoped for. There really is no comparison. If you're getting something of this price I would go with Allan's. Great leather cover as well as the best binding. The ESV1 is much softer than the ESV3 by the way. Well worth the difference.

Hope that helps.

Steve

[Steve Robenalt]

Correction - I meant to say that the Crossway would not lay open flat toward either end of bible.

Steve

[Knight]

Steve,

Thanks for the note. I have seen some pictures of Crossway's calfskin (http://kowalker.com/2009/03/23/esv-classic-reference-bible-calfskin/) that look pretty good.

My only hangup with Allan's is the Anglicized Text. (i.e.: European spelling of certain words.) Call me picky but I find that annoying.

[Steve Robenalt]

I believe it is only about a dozen words from what I was told by Allan's. And I haven't really noticed it bothering me. For the price the Allan's is certainly the better bang for your buck. It's really hard to tell until you actually hold both and compare. That's where the binding on the Allan's really shines as well as the ESV1's highland goatskin.

By the way, if you're interested Allan's will be coming out with the PSR Edition in the Fall, but the text will be printed by Crossway and bound by Allan's so it won't be Anglicized.

[Knight]

Steve,

Thanks for the scoop. This fall is about the time I could afford it anyway so I've got plenty of time to make my decision.

[D Johnson]

This review and, the Bible it measures, are disappointing. First, let me say that I have no affiliation with any Bible publisher. I honestly don't know how anyone could pick up this book and think that the text block is acceptable for this price range. The paper is yellow/creamish and yet is not very opaque. The end result is that there is significant ghosting (you can read the words on the other side of the page) and there is little contrast between the text and the paper itself. The Crossway Classic Reference bible, while not as well bound, is much easier to read...and what is the point of owning a Bible if not to read it?

[D Johnson]

I should also add that the binding is very nice, very similar to the Cambridge Pitt Minion. I would prefer if "Holy Bible" wasn't printed on the front. Hope this is helpful.

[Ryan]

I got one of these and really like it. The grain is very attractive. I am not a yapp guy so this edition is great for me. The goatskin is not melt in your hand flexible, but it is nice. It feels really durable, like I could take it anywhere and do anything with it. The bleed through is more than I had hoped, but its not terrible. I bought it for when I have to read and speak in places where the NRSV is not accepted. I am completely satisfied with it.

[J.D.]

I am by no means a collector of fine Bibles, but I do have a few including a Cambridge Pitt-Minion goatskin NASB, Cambridge Pitt-Minion two-tone fake leather ESV, Cambridge wide margin goatskin NASB, Lockman's In Touch Calfskin NASB, Nelson thinline NKJV, and Oxford KJV, to name a few.

I just received the Antique Brown ESV3 and I am reservedly impressed. I say "reservedly" because I don't get quite the same feeling picking it up as I do, say, with the wide margin goatskin, or Lockman calfskin. That being said, it is also far from the feeling of handling a genuine leather ESV Classic Reference.

The cover is flexible, but not as much as the wide-margin Cambridge goatskin or the Lockman calfskin, but is more flexible than a Pitt-Minion French Moracco cover. The grain and color are unique, and the Bible has a ruggedness to it that is very appealing. It lays open flat when opened to Genesis or Revelation, and all places in between. It is already getting more flexible, and I suspect it will wear-in quite well.

The text block is the perfect size. There is no note-taking room to speak of, but that's not why I bought it. The paper is not a pure white, like on the Nelson thinline, but it certainly doesn't lean to the cream color that I've read about above. There is ghosting from the opposite side of the page, but not any more than I've seen with any other Bible (except the Lockman In Touch, which has very thick paper). I have done a few small underlines with Parker black ballpoint and Fisher black ballpoint. Other than some ghosting, there is no bleed-through.

Here's my bottomline: it's a perfect Bible for sticking in a briefcase, carrying to church, and traveling - the "Daily Reading Bible" - which is what I have looked for. I don't feel like I have to baby it, either because it is too nice, or too cheap. It's a good size, not to large, and not too thick.

[Robert]

About a year-and-a-half ago I purchased a fine highland goatskin ESV1 (Anglicized) from Allan's, and was pleased as punch! Not long thereafter, after about 3 full seconds of impressive gymnastics involving a glass of water and two or three pieces of living room furniture, I spilled water all over it.

Naturally I assumed that this is just my problem, and that it's no concern of Allan's. I still used it daily, but it was heartbreaking every time I did so, holding such a wonderful Allan Bible that had been damaged like this. So against all hope, all reason and every principle of business sense and capitalistic enterprise, I wrote Allan's in the spirit of something or other and asked if they would consider replacing it.

They've done me one better. Since they're out of ESV1s right now they are sending me a complimentary ESV3!!

An organization like this deserves our ongoing support, patronage, and informal advertising to friends, families and colleagues. Long live R.L. Allan!

[Chris Bloom]

It might be of interest to y'all that evangelicalbible.com has their ESV3s and NIVC3s -- all buffalo goatskin -- on clearance right now, in order to make room for the new NASBs and ESV1s.

[Raymond Sloat]

I just recieved a black ESV3 and I hate to say it but feel that I have just spent $35 more than I should have for a comparable Bible. Even on sale I paid $87 plus shipping and that cost puts this Bible is in the same price category as the Lockman NASB in premium calfskin. The later of which is 10X the quality of the ESV3 at approximatly the same cost.

My recommendation would be to save up until you can purchase the ESV1 unless portabitility is your driving factor on chosing the ESV3. I am planning on keeping the Bible and will give an update on how it holds up to daily use.